🔗 Share this article

Do your LinkedIn connections recognizing you as a thought leader? Do numerous commenters praising your advice on expanding your venture? Do recruiters reaching out to explore collaborations?

Should that not be the case, the reason could be that you're not male.

The Test: Modifying Profile Gender to achieve Increased Reach

Dozens of female professionals joined a collective LinkedIn experiment this week after viral posts suggested that changing their gender to "man" enhanced their platform visibility.

Some participants modified their profiles to incorporate what they called "bro-coded" terminology - adding results-driven professional jargon like "propel", "revolutionize" and "expedite". Anecdotally, their visibility also improved.

Systemic Preference Questions Brought Up

The engagement increase has caused some to wonder whether a built-in gender bias in the platform's system favors men who employ online business jargon.

Similar to many large social media platforms, LinkedIn utilizes a computerized system to determine which posts are shown to which users - boosting some while suppressing others.

Platform Response

Through a blog post, LinkedIn recognized the phenomenon but claimed it does not consider "demographic information" when deciding post visibility. Rather, the company mentioned that "hundreds of signals" affect how content perform.

Changing gender in your settings does not affect how your content appears in search or feed.

Personal Experiences

A social media consultant, who changed her gender identifiers to "male pronouns" and her name to "a masculine version", described remarkable outcomes.

"The numbers I'm seeing indicate a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a 1,300% increase in impressions," she commented.

Megan Cornish, a marketing expert, began experimenting after observing her reach decrease significantly.

The Method

• Initially, she modified her gender to "male"
• Then, she used artificial intelligence to rephrase her profile using "masculine-oriented" wording
• Finally, she repurposed old posts with similar "agentic" language

The result was instantaneous: a 415% increase in reach within seven days.

The Negative Aspect

Although the success, Cornish expressed unhappiness with the method.

"Before, my content were softer - concise and clever, but also warm and relatable," she explained. "Now, the bro-coded version was assertive and confident - like a Caucasian man swaggering around."

She abandoned the test after one week, stating "Every day I continued, and outcomes got better, I became angrier."

Varying Outcomes

Not all testers experienced positive results. Cass Cooper who changed both her profile gender to "man" and her race to "Caucasian" described a reduction in reach and engagement.

"We understand there's algorithmic bias, but it's very challenging to understand how it operates in specific cases or the reasons behind it," she remarked.

Broader Implications

These experiments occur alongside ongoing conversations about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a business platform and community site.

Recent changes in the past few months have apparently resulted in women professionals experiencing significantly reduced exposure, leading to informal experiments where identical content by male and female users received vastly different reach.

Technical Explanation

Per LinkedIn, the platform uses AI systems to classify and distribute posts based on multiple factors, including post content and the user's professional identity.

The company claims it frequently assesses its systems, including "examinations of gender-related disparities."

Company representative proposed that recent declines in certain members' visibility might originate from increased competition due to more content on the platform.

Evolving Environment

According to a tester noted, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the platform.

"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and polished," she remarked. "That's changing. It's becoming increasingly aggressive and unpredictable."