🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's lawmakers have voted to withdraw from an global treaty designed to safeguard females from violence, covering family violence, following prolonged and intense discussions in the parliament.

Thousands of demonstrators assembled in Riga this past week to oppose the decision. The ultimate authority now lies with Head of State the nation's president, who must determine whether to endorse or veto the legislation.

Referred to as the European treaty, the international accord only took effect in the Baltic state last twelve months ago, mandating authorities to develop legal frameworks and assistance programs to eliminate all types of violence.

The Baltic nation has become the initial European Union member to initiate the procedure of exiting from the treaty. The transcontinental nation pulled out in two years ago, a decision that human rights organizations described as a significant setback for gender equality.

Political Debate and Resistance

The international agreement was ratified by the European Union in last year, yet traditionalist factions have contended that its emphasis on equal rights weakens traditional families and advances what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a thirteen-hour debate in the Latvian parliament, lawmakers decided 56 to 32 to withdraw from the convention, a action sponsored by political opponents but backed by politicians from one of the three governing partners.

The outcome represents a defeat for moderate conservative Prime Minister the nation's PM, who joined demonstrators outside parliament earlier this week. "We will not surrender, we will persist in our struggle so that violence does not triumph," she declared to the crowd.

Ideological Disagreements and Reactions

One of the primary parties supporting the withdrawal is a nationalist party, whose head has urged the public to select from what he terms a "natural family" and "gender ideology with multiple sexes".

Latvia's ombudswoman the rights official urged the agreement not to be made political, while the organization the rights organization stated it was "not a danger to national principles, it was an instrument to achieve them".

The recent decision has sparked broad protest both within Latvia and internationally.

Twenty-two thousand individuals have signed a Latvian petition demanding the convention to be maintained. The women's rights organization the rights center has called a demonstration for the coming week, charging lawmakers of disregarding the will of the Latvian people.

International Worries and Potential Next Steps

The leader of the Council of Europe's legislative body stated that the Baltic state had made a hasty decision driven by false information. He characterized it as an "unprecedented and deeply concerning regression for female equality and human rights in Europe".

He noted that since the transcontinental nation abandoned the treaty in 2021, instances of femicide and violence against women had risen sharply.

Because the vote did not secure a supermajority majority, the president could potentially return the bill for further review if he has objections.

President Rinkevics announced on social media that he would assess the vote according to constitutional requirements, "considering state and legal considerations, rather than ideological or political viewpoints".

Last week, another member of the governing alliance, the Progressives, suggested it would not rule out petitioning to the Constitutional Court.

"This decision represents a worrisome situation for women's rights not only in Latvia but across Europe," stated a rights advocate.

• Family violence statistics have been rising in multiple EU countries
• The Istanbul Convention mandates particular safeguards for victims of gender-based violence
• The nation's decision could affect similar debates in additional member states